Hey Guys,
Just wanted to chime in here with some data to help illustrate why these pools in particular make sense to reduce emissions for.
The AEC has made some major progress over the last 7-8 months in keeping ACX emissions at reasonable levels given the growth of LP and the success of the protocol. These are our most highly utilised pools and do the majority of our volumes.
In contrast the three pools we are suggesting cutting rates for are markedly out of line with this reasonable emissions philosophy. This proposal should it progress to vote is simply looking to correct that.
I agree there is merit in splitting the proposal into three separate votes so that ACX holders can vote in a more targeted manner.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Dylan