# Straddl.io Expansion Proposal

**URL:** <https://forum.across.to/t/straddl-io-expansion-proposal/2037>\
**Category:** Active Proposals\
**Created:** [February 26, 2025, 11:34pm UTC](https://forum.across.to/t/straddl-io-expansion-proposal/2037 "2025-02-26T23:34:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bananachain](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.across.to/bananachain/32/1249_2.png) [@Bananachain](https://forum.across.to/u/Bananachain)\
**Post date:** [February 28, 2025, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.across.to/t/straddl-io-expansion-proposal/2037/8 "2025-02-28T16:29:16Z")

</div>

I have some points I would like to share and am interested in your thoughts:

The current funding request draft requests ACX with an indicative USD value only. This appears not be in line with the [Across Governance Operating Manual](https://forum.across.to/t/across-governance-operating-manual/1447), see [Proposal Types](https://forum.across.to/t/across-governance-operating-manual/1447#proposal-types-5), Treasury Funding-Medium which requires USD value funding requests. That may affect any ACX payout depending on exchange rate.

The request seeks retroactive funding (Infinity) as well as “future” funding.

- It may be helpful to provide some more details on Infinities contributions for those readers who have not followed his activities. I personally have no doubt it is well deserved!

- Regarding “future” funding it appears to be a payout upfront. Aren’t payouts usually milestone based? And if yes, what would those be in relation to funding amounts and how would they be monitored and evaluated? I did see the bullet points regarding expenses and a reference made to the things that you are planning of completing.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.across.to/t/straddl-io-expansion-proposal/2037)._
